....."Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known". Matthew 10:26 (KJV)

Sunday, April 28, 2013

"2010: The Year We Make Contact": propaganda for solar neutrinos and standard solar model?

As Leonov and Discovery launch away, Bowman appears once again to Hal and tells him that their mission has been a success and repeats that "something wonderful" is going to happen. Hal admits once again to Bowman that he is afraid, to which Bowman simply replies "Don't be". He commands Hal to break his communication link with the Leonov and to repeatedly broadcast a final message to Earth:
Jupiter is engulfed by monoliths, which increase its density to the point that nuclear fusion occurs, transforming the planet into a small star. Discovery is consumed in the blast, but the Leonov breaks away and begins its long journey home. The new star's miraculous appearance later inspires American and Soviet leaders to seek peace. Over the centuries that follow, Europa gradually transforms from an icy wasteland to a humid jungle covered with plant life. A Monolith stands in the primeval Europan swamp, waiting for intelligent life forms to find it.

From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_%28film%29

Above three images - the first is Jupiter which stats to become a "fusion" star (in the film), the second is Jupiter starting to be a star and destroying Discovery starship, third images is the "to be inhabited by spontaeously generated life" satellite of Jupiter, Europa (see article below).

 "Jupiter's Europa moon is 'more likely to support life than the deserts of Mars', claim NASA scientists
  • Europa is the sixth closest moon to the faraway planet
  • Scientists say that it has an ocean and a thin shelf of ice
  • It was discovered by Galileo in January 1610 
 By Steve Nolan

Theory of the "nuclear fusion" as source of energy of the stars is born in the thirties by Hans Bethe and Carl von Weizsacker

Hans Bethe:

"....Bethe was born in Strasbourg, Germany, the son of Anna (née Kuhn) and Albrecht Bethe, a professor of physiology.[5] Although his mother was Jewish, he was raised a Christian in the religion of his father. Despite having a religious background, he was not a religious person in later life[6] and called himself an atheist.[7] 

Bethe studied physics at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, and went on to earn his doctorate from the University of Munich with supervisor Arnold Sommerfeld, after which he did postdoctoral stints in Cambridge and at Enrico Fermi's laboratory in Rome. He was influenced by Fermi's simplicity and Sommerfeld's rigor in approaching problems, and these qualities influenced his own later research......." [Wikipedia]

Below, the logo of University of Munich with Queen of Heaven and Tammuz:

Weizsäcker was allowed to return to the part of Germany administrated by the Western Allies in 1946, and became director of a department for theoretical physics in the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Göttingen. From 1957 to 1969, Weizsäcker was professor of philosophy at the University of Hamburg. In 1957 he won the Max Planck medal. In 1970 he formulated a "Weltinnenpolitik" (world internal policy). From 1970 to 1980, he was head of the Max Planck Institute for the Research of Living Conditions in the Modern World in Starnberg. He researched and published on the danger of nuclear war, what he saw as the conflict between the First World and the Third World, and the consequences of environmental degradation.
In the 1970s he founded, together with the Indian philosopher Pandit Gopi Krishna, a research foundation "for western sciences and eastern wisdom".

 After his retirement in 1980 he became a Christian pacifist, and intensified his work on the conceptual definition of quantum physics, particularly on the Copenhagen interpretation.
His experiences in the Nazi era, and with his own behavior in that time, gave Weizsäcker an interest in questions of ethics and responsibility. In 1957, he was one of the Göttinger 18, a group of prominent German physicists who protested against the idea that the Bundeswehr (West German armed forces) should be equipped with tactical nuclear weapons. He further suggested that West Germany should declare its definitive abdication of all kinds of nuclear weapons.
In 2007, Weizsäcker died at the age of 94 in Söcking near Starnberg. Opinions are split on the question of whether he accepted his share of responsibility for the German scientific community's efforts to build a nuclear weapon for Nazi Germany.
......" [Wikipedia]

"...Solar collapse not fusion has been found to be the cause of solar energy. But that would undercut the entire Big Bang theory.....The problem is the fusion process should produce lots of subatomic particles called neutrinos, and each  square inch of earth's surface should be hit each second by a trillion  neutrinos...The scientific bases for solar collapse , as the source of solar energy, was developed over a century ago by two brilliant scientists: Hermann von Helmoltz and Lord Kelvin. But evolutionists cannot accept this possibility, because it would mean the universe (and the earth) is much younger. Nuclear fusion would mean billions of years for a star's life; solar collapse only a few million..............." From the Evolution Handbook - Evolution Facts, Inc.
  Modern science is simply the War On Creationism by the Roman Empire. After having entered the key words, look at the first page appeared on Google searching engine:

[image impossible to upload]

   If you explore one of the anti-Creationist site, you have the sensation of a war of annihilation against Creationism and the believing in a God. Notice the years of the experiments quoted in the anti-Creationist site:

The Solar FAQ

Solar Neutrinos and Other Solar Oddities

 URL: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-solar.html

  Take a look at the scientific bombing. The greatest number of experiments in that page quoted, occurred no more than twenty years ago! If we consider other ten years of preparation, it is interesting to note that a frenzy was shacking the physic world in order to find the "solar neutrinos". Parallel to this the cinema developed further the Science Fiction based on an universe filled with intelligent form of life whose origin are quite presented as "spontaneous" [f.e. Star Wars]. Isn't this a form of occult coordination between the World  Science Establishment and the Amusement and Cultural Industry? Coordinated by the religion of the Evolutionism?

 In 1964 die-hard evolutionism starts the game:

".......The first solar neutrino experiment (Davis 1964) was based on the "reverse beta decay" of chlorine atoms. It consists of a large tank placed deep in a mine in South Dakota, USA. The tank is filled with some 600 tons of cleaning fluid, perchloroethylene, containing more than 1030 atoms of chlorine. Every few days, one of these atoms is reverse-beta-converted into argon. According to the standard solar model, an atom should have been converted every day, but the rate actually measured was no more than half of this. In 2002, Davis received the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on solar neutrinos..........."

Then the experiments literally 'exploded'. And at the same time,  also the UFO/Alien abduction brainwash agenda :

"........Two important new solar neutrino experiments have reported results during the past two years. GNO (Altmann et al., 2000) is a new, larger gallium experiment, intended to add weight to the existing data. But the one called SNO is novel and highly significant. It utilizes, among other things, the "reverse-fusion" reaction mentioned above. This enables it to distinguish between different neutrino flavors, and between different types of neutrino interactions, something that Super-K does only with difficulty, and the reverse-beta experiments not at all. The value of this is discussed in e.g. Fogli & Lisi & Montanino (1998) or Villante & Fiorentini & Lisi (1999). SNO started taking data in 1999 (Sincell 1999), and has now reported its first results (Ahmad et al 2001a, 2001b, 2002a, 2002b). On one hand, the number of electron neutrinos remains too low, same as the other experiments see. But what's new is that the SNO results unequivocally show that the total number of neutrinos, adding all flavors, precisely match the predictions from the standard solar model. In other words, neutrinos appear to be converted from one flavour to another en route, and arrive as a mixture of flavours. This kind of flavour mixing is explained in section Neutrino oscillations below.........." [same URL of above]
All that they transmit is a feeling of self-building of premises and conclusions which runs inside a closed system, the Scientific Evolutionary Establishment. Can you trust such an Evolutionist  Bureaucracy?

"...."2010 (also known as 2010: The Year We Make Contact) is a 1984 American science fiction film written and directed by Peter Hyams...."

".....2010: Odyssey Two is a 1982 best-selling science fiction novel by Arthur C. Clarke. It is the sequel to the 1968 novel 2001: A Space Odyssey,......". [both from Wikip.]

Above image - original caption "Jupiter's diameter is one order of magnitude smaller (×0.10045) than the Sun, and one order of magnitude larger (×10.9733) than the Earth. The Great Red Spot has roughly the same size as the circumference of the Earth.". Keep in mind that Solar mass is 1,000 [= 10exp3] times the one of Jupiter - URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter

Tuesday, April 23, 2013



Wednesday, April 24, 2013

From Origene to Biglino


".....Mauro Biglino translated for the Edizioni San Paolo nineteen books of the Bible. Twelve published in the book "The Minor Prophets", five in the book "Five Meghillot."

In relation to his work as an official translator of the Bible, Mauro Biglino was interviewed by the Italian National Television and on many national radio stations, also holds conferences and seminars throughout Italy.

The Bible Hebraica Stuttgartensia is the first printed edition of the Masoretic text, the Leningrad Code deducted from the year 1008 AD which is the original text of the Bible reference of the Roman Catholic Church,
for the Bible of the Protestant Christian Churches  (the King James Version), and the Torah of the Jewish religion.....
Publications after the release of the Edizioni Paoline

He has published four books in Italy with the publisher Uno Editori, two of which are dedicated to research and the work of re-translation of the original Hebrew text of the Old Testament, set with the Hebrew text and the literal translation of the Bible Hebraica Stuttgartensia, reported word by word with a simple, understandable for every type of player.

The two publications of Mauro Biglino dedicated to the Old Testament are "The Book that will forever change our ideas about the Bible" and "The Alien God of the Bible" (Uno Editori), preceded by the books, "the Roman Catholic Church and Freemasonry" and "Resurrection reincarnation". Before turning to writing, the author has worked ten years for the publishing house Edizioni San Paolo, as a translator of ancient Hebrew Masoretic text of the original Bible.

URL:  http://it.nostradamus.wikia.com/wiki/Mauro_Biglino

".....The collection Interlinear Hebrew Bible, San Paolo [ Edizioni - publishing house], is published since 2001. Till now  have been published the first 21 books. Edited by Piergiorgio Beretta, contains the Hebrew text of the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, with interlinear translation of Christian Duties OCD and Mauro Biglino (the 12 Minor Prophets and Meghillot 5), the greek text of the Septuagint ["of the Seventies" in the original text], ed. Alfred Rahlfs, the Latin text of the Clementine Vulgate, the Italian version of the newest version. Notes and tools that are particularly rich backdrop to an interlinear translation that has caused 'confusion' in scholars such as Monsignor Gianfranco Ravasi...".

From: Traduzioni della Bibbia in italiano/Translations of the Bible into Italian

URL: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traduzioni_della_Bibbia_in_italiano

 "...First of all, thank you to dedicate a bit 'of your time. To start I think it is interesting to explain who he is and how Biglino Mauro has approached these issues.

Thank you for your interest. In summary I say that for many years I worked in the publishing world for thirty years and I am interested in the history of religions, I studied Hebrew to get closer to the original text of the most important religion of the West and then I started translating for Edizioni San Paolo who have published seventeen books of the Old Testament translated by me literally for the necklace of the Hebrew Bible Interlinear. The relationship was interrupted when I began to publish essays in which I analyzed the literal translations.

Seem to understand that the Vatican has not taken well this  your "turning point". Besides halting the professional relationships with you showed other signs of impatience?

In concrete terms were Edizioni San Paolo that I have given more assignments, disrupting the relationship, because obviously they can not agree or
also indirectly endorse what I write. If they had continued with the tasks someone would have thought that in some way they could support what I say.

Typically those who have most strongly opposed to your searches and what claims?

Undoubtedly, the Catholic fundamentalism which claims the custody of the indisputable truth revealed.

URL:  http://ufologando.altervista.org/index.php/paleoastronautica/137-gli-elohim-della-bibbia-intervista-a-mauro-biglino

"...The history of the Edizioni San Paolo is closely linked to that of the Society of St. Paul, the religious congregation founded August 20, 1914 in Alba (CN) by Giacomo Alberione. The idea of ​​Father Alberione was to create a "Catholic organization of writers, technicians and librarians" composed of consecrated persons, members of a religious congregation ad hoc.
 Edizioni San Paolo are managed by the male branch of the Society of St. Paul and should not be confused with the Paulist that belong instead to the women's branch of the congregation. Even the libraries, specialized in religious publishing, we distinguish between St. Paul Libraries, managed by the fathers Pauline, Pauline and Libraries managed by nuns....."

URL:  http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Paolo_Edizioni

"........The Società San Paolo (Latin Societas a Sancto Paulo Apostolo) is a male religious institute of pontifical right: the members of this clerical congregation, commonly called Paolini, postpone their name to the acronym SSP [1]
 The origins date back to the foundation of the institute in 1914 at Alba [city of Piedmont - remember the Vaudoises and their by-Rome cursed Old Latin Vulgate] of a printing school by the work of blessed Giacomo Alberione; around it it arose a congregation of priests dedicated to preaching through the press and other means of social communication, which received diocesan approval in 1927 and the final one by Pope Pius XII in 1949..........."

URL:  http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societ%C3%A0_San_Paolo

In 1949 Pious XII consecrated the "Virgo Fidelis" - or: Lady of War - to Carabineers' army. Remember that the army was founded in 1814 in Piedmont by staunchly anti-Protestant, anti-Jewish Savoy king - see link in References].

The allegorical exegesis of ORIGEN 

IV. Origen (184-254 A.D.)

A. Origen was a disciple of Clement of Alexandria.
B. He held to the same doctrine as Clement, plus he taught baptism was necessary for babies to gain salvation.
C. Origen stated, "The Scriptures are of little use to those who understand them as they are written." (Ibid. p. 192).
D. Dr. Wilkinson stated, "When we come to Origen, we speak the name of him who did the most of all to create and give direction to the forces of apostasy down through the centuries." (Ibid.).
E. Origen was one of the first textual critics. His textual work in both the N.T. and the O.T. (the "Hexapla") was the basis for two of the most corrupt manuscripts used by the Roman Catholic Church. (Vaticanus and Sinaiticus).
F. Origen developed a method of Biblical interpretation which is called "allegorization". Origen believed the Bible was only a set of stories that illustrate truth, but not literal facts. He believed Christ to be created and subordinate to the Father (the same as Jehovah's Witnesses), the pre-existence of the soul before birth (the same as the Mormons), and the final restoration of all spirits (Universal Salvation). (see Dr. Earle Cairns "Christianity Through The Centuries", Zondervan Publishing House, p. 122).

The allegorical exegesis of MAURO BIGLINO

URL: http://claudio56.wordpress.com/2012/11/25/mauro-biglino-e-lintepretazione-letterale-della-bibbia/

In summary, Biglino explains that, according to him:

     the term elohim, which translates to God, Lord, etc., is actually plural, which by itself would in any crisis monotheistic approach;
     that the supreme leader of the Elohim, the Elyon, he divided the land into areas controlled by each elohim;
     in many Bible verses is confirmed that the elohim were more than one;
     that the cherubim described in the Bible have nothing to do with the angels, but they were cars, some of which were flying and riding the elohim to move;
     that the angels (other than the cherubim) were messengers of the Elohim;
     that the priests were human beings in the service of the Elohim (a kind of servitude);
     that the elohim were aliens sent to earth for some unknown reason. The land could even be a sort of penal colony which they were convicted;
     that the elohim, while living on average much longer than humans, they were still mortal and were certainly not "good", in fact they were warriors, jealous and vindictive;
     that the elohim created the adam (man) through genetic crossing their DNA with that of hominids already on the planet;
     etc ...

     A comment under the post on Mauro Biglino's videos at page: http://noiegliextraterrestri.blogspot.it/2012/07/video-nuova-intervista-mauro-biglino.html

Ivrit said ...

     Some considerations on the translation of the first verse of Genesis.
     The bet of complacency does not exist, can not be composed of ברא bet + רא with the sense of "seeing" (as the prof.). "Seeing" is in fact the root "ראה" and "רא" is the root instead of "ירא" (fear). The teacher can do what he likes to say the first verse of Genesis when read out of context, but then ... grammar made ​​of it? The first term "בראשית" means "in principle" and not simply "in principle", this term always sticks to the next. So we have "in principle to create" with "ברא" vocalized infinity. The professor then said that the text speaks of Elohim in the plural. One thing that arouses no little wonder that a professor of Hebrew do not know how to distinguish a simple plural of a plural of abstraction, which is a unique in all respects. Verbs connected to it are in fact singular and "Elohim" has the definite article and is therefore a proper name being self-determined proper names. The singular is "Eloah" root "alah" = compose legal rules. So it means "Legislator" that with the plural of abstraction ("Elohim) becomes: Supreme Lawgiver.
     The term "shemim" mentioned by prof. does not exist, the term remains "shammaim" is also plural of abstraction, which means "heaven." The term "רקיע" is root "רקע" from which derives the term "קרקע" which means "soil".
     The professor said that his deductions come from the Bible, but it seems to me that they are just a figment of his imagination or something else.

     But this professor really has translated the Bible editions of Paul as he says? If all translators are like him ...

     August 3, 2012 18:47

Tuesday, April 23, 2013




Tuesday, December 04, 2012

New Age mystifications at the service of Roman Catholicism? 


Friday, November 28, 2008

Simply to destroy the innocence (part two) 


Tuesday, April 23, 2013



    The dad of Sitchin, Icke and Biglino?

    Or: how to counter the epochal failure of Evolutionism? Idea: Let's say that Aliens created life and/or man.

    Evolutionism and atheism are just collapsed and only Science Fiction can help to sustain a just destroyed honor with a "fantastic science" moved far away in the future or far away in the past.

     As Official Science is ashamed to appear addicted from SF, it is better to make both to appear as "apparently in enmity". But what could do Official Science, in her mission to deny God and Creation, without the vital and discrete aid coming from Sitchin, Biglino, Icke, Aliens, and C.? 

Above image - Francis Crick [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Crick]

Above image - Zecharia Sitchin [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zecharia_Sitchin].

"......Life from Mars
In   1973,   Crick proposed a theory of directed panspermia, suggesting that life on earth could have originated from DNA "seeds" projected into space by an extraterrestrial civilisation. This is in contrast with normal panspermia (undirected) where life merely has its origins in space (a very broad assertion, with a range of interesting ramifications), but no intelligent entities were behind it. Because of this, he has sometimes been cited by the intelligent design movement as an example of a secular and atheist proponent of intelligent design. However, Crick never asserted that directed panspermia was a fact, just an interesting possibility, and seems to have later discarded the idea.[1]

URL: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Francis_Crick

    Like the 9-11, you must always show the details as "they wanted to keep 'em hidden", only in this way the people would drink the business and give their hearts to you for nothing.

 "...Life from Mars...":

Sunday, March 31, 2013

NASA hiding the DEFINITIVE proof of intelligent life on Mars!!! 


Saturday, April 20, 2013

Evolutionism as Weapon of the Roman Empire.


    Have you noted the similarity between the Denial of Creationism and the Denial of Holocaust? 

    All "science" based:

     From URL: http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=310&mpp=15&p=2

by:  Coyote
Posts: 3884
Joined: 01-12-2008
Member Rating: 9.2

You are exactly correct in your post. (I love the amount of detail you put into your posts!)
As an archaeologist who does a lot of radiocarbon dating, I have studied the literature extensively to figure out all of the things I need to do to make my dates as accurate as possible (and I have both written a monograph on the subject and delivered a number of papers at professional meetings).
Creationists are just the opposite; they want the method to be incorrect, so they misrepresent what the laboratories or the archaeologists or other -ologists do. They misrepresent the facts as often as possible to raise doubts in their readers' minds, all in support of their religious beliefs.
Here's another fraud on their part that I documented and blogged elsewhere:
Coal from Russia from the “Pennsylvanian,” supposedly 300 million years old, was dated at 1,680 years. (Radiocarbon, vol. 8, 1966) Source

False information due to sloppy research.
This is a difficult reference to track down because the actual page number is not provided. It appears that each creationist website just copies from the previous without checking the original citation. (The information in question is on page 319.)
The original source for the false information seems to be Ken Ham, Andrew Snelling, and Carl Weiland’s The Answers Book, published by Master Books, El Cajon, CA, in 1992 (page 73).
The original article in the journal Radiocarbon includes the following paragraph describing this sample:
Mo-334. River Naryn, Kirgizia — 1680 ± 170. A.D. 270
Coal from the cultural layer on the left side of the r. Naryn (Kirgizian SSR), 3 km E of the mourh of the r. Alabuga (41° 25′ N Lat, 74° 40′ E Long). The sample was found at a depth of 7.6 m in the form of scattered coals in a loamy rock in deposits of a 26-m terrace. According to the archaeological estimations the sample dates from the 5 to 7th centuries A.D. The sample was found by K. V. Kurdyumov (Moscow State Univ.) in 1962. Comment: the find serves as a verification of archaeological data on the peopling of the Tien Shan.
What we have here is no more than shorthand or sloppy translation from the Russian! The coal is nothing more than charcoal from an archaeological deposit. This sample is even included in the section of the report dealing with archaeological samples, and the paragraph discusses archaeological data.
The odd use of terms is shown clearly in another radiocarbon date, Mo-353, reported on page 315 of the same article. It reads “Charcoal from cultural deposits of a fisher site. The coal was coll. from subturfic humified loam…”
But the term “coal” in place of “charcoal” was enough to fool Ken Ham, as well as dozens of subsequent creationists who apparently were salivating to find 300 million year old coal radiocarbon dated to recent times, and who repeated Ham’s false claim without bothering to check its accuracy.
The interesting question is where Ken Ham managed to find “Pennsylvanian” in that short paragraph, and where he dug up the date of 300 million years.
This is still another case where a creationist claim about science falls apart when examined more closely.
Vinogradov, A.P.; A.L. Devirts; E.I. Dobinka; and N.G. Markova. Radiocarbon dating in the Vernadsky Institute I-IV. Radiocarbon, Vol 8, 1966, pp. 292-323.
=====================I have documented several more of these common creationist "errors," which are repeated so often, are so easily checked, and are so seldom corrected when it is discovered that they are nonsense, that they certainly amount to frauds.
These creationist analyses are supposed to document the erroneous nature of radiocarbon dating. What they do instead is show that creation "science" is an oxymoron.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
This message is a reply to:
Message 13 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2009 6:28 PMRAZD has responde

     The one above is one of the typical errors of Creationists and on which the Evolutionism bases his fortunes today. Creationist scientists doesn't exist no more as the Roman Empire wiped them away from the scientific establishment of the planet.  The Jesuit gnosticism project called science consists in to create a series of "special effects" who could be reproduced in any social, cultural and ideological context in order to impress the spectator about the presumed "inconsistency" of Creationism.  From here it is born the scientific assioma of "repetibility" which is not an objective assumption but in itself a religious occult declaration. The science is religion as opposes to the single instant of God's creation substituting it with infinite moments of man's creation. This anti-godly monster grew up in a net of monstruous bureucratic complexity where the Truth, as It couldn't be destroyed, is hidden in a jungle of datas, interpretations, and epistemologic perspectives. A jungle inhabited by predators such as the "scientists", a term today automatically considered synonimous of "Evolutionist" and therefore synonymous of "Implacable Enemy of Creationism/God". 

 Evolutionism therefore lives on the errors of the Creationism, or, in other world, is a scientific method to build theories (starting from from Creationism's errors) aimed to confirm a without-God universe  - from the above excerpt:

".....I have documented several more of these common creationist "errors," which are repeated so often, are so easily checked, and are so seldom corrected when it is discovered that they are nonsense, that they certainly amount to frauds.
These creationist analyses are supposed to document the erroneous nature of radiocarbon dating. What they do instead is show that creation "science" is an oxymoron.........".

    The ideological core of such 'critic' is the same of the critics on Larry Silverstein's admission for having ordered the blowing of WTC7, where Larry "radiocarbon 14" Silverstein is 'dating' the order of demolition well back before the 'flood' of the 9-11 attack and therefore is considered the "smoking gun" in order to frame the "Noah" 's descendants (insistently indicated in the CIA/Mossad cabal) who religiously are claiming that no order of demolition existed before.....  It remains only to mind if Larry "Radiocarbon" has been purposely injected in the context of the 9-11 attack by an invisible hand in order to blame America & Jews and to praise Islam (the strategic religious partner of Roman Catholicism today), but this is promptly denied by the mainstream leaders of the "9-11 Truth movement", no more or less the mainstream science today is denying any hidden procedural hand injecting Carbon 14 in the scientific analysis today.

Sunday, March 31, 2013

NASA hiding the DEFINITIVE proof of intelligent life on Mars!!!